![]() ![]() Greenspan consolidated central banking for financialization by hardening the Fed’s bail-out promise and its focus on ‘wealth effects’. In the US case, Paul Volcker’s aggressive interest rate hikes to eliminate ‘inflation scares’ ushered in an area in which monetary policy became focused on bond market credibility. A dilemma arose with deteriorating price competitiveness that the Buba resolved by imposing an export version of secular stagnation. In the German case, the Buba carved out a powerful disciplining role for itself in corporatist coordination, which aligned with the demand-restraining features of Germany’s export-led model corporate profit expectations signaled economic health. To explain why the Bundesbank and Federal Reserve have come to support the German and US growth models during Post-Fordism, I look at how sense-making processes informed policy innovations. But since the 1970s, policy activism has become more important. Historical institutionalists plausibly argue that central banks have learned to pursue these policies because dominant coalitions have shaped central banks’ institutional roles. ![]() Drawing on growth models theory, I argue that export-led and debt-led growth models imply fundamentally different versions of central banking and rely on different combinations of monetary, financial, and exchange-rate policies. Also in academia, there is a scarcity of literature on the position of central banks in the framework of state bureaucracies, except for one aspect: in. ![]() Research departments of central banks do not employ many sociologists. This article revives the comparative political economy of central banking. Leon Wansleben, The rise of central banks: state power in financial capitalism, Harvard University Press, 2022, 340 pages. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |